Pages

Thursday, 17 June 2010

Message in a bottle


Lebanon is, in many ways, an intricate blend of Third World (sorry, Developing World) bribery and rabid, no-holds-barred capitalism. You can do what you will, but it will cost you and the man providing the service might well take his cut, too.

Case in point: The government and the Internet.


So, the Lebanese government makes oodles of cash off the back of cell phone charges. The standard rate for a minute is 0.33 USD. That’s ridiculously expensive when you consider the average Lebanese income. 60-70 per cent of the country owns a cell phone. Do the math.


Now, the government is moving to protect this income stream by banning VOIP programs (that’s Voice-Over-Internet-Protocols, or video chat programs to the luddites out there). Nice move guys, nice move.


This is just part of the latest lesson in Self-Servicing Economics 101 delivered by the government and really boggles the mind. There’s a law up for debate in parliament that would do all sorts of unpleasantness to Internet users.


There are several wonderful measures concerning the ability of a new, unelected, body to take personal data for use in various investigations. But, perhaps the most ridiculous one is the levy on all Internet transactions.


Bizarre.


Western Union is evil and must be
punished 

Lebanon escaped the financial storm of recent times relatively unscathed thanks to some responsible fiscal policies. Now they’re in a position to reap the benefits and, by all accounts, the money is rolling in due to minimal taxation.


So… here’s a great idea. Let’s tax Internet transactions of any sort size or shape. Genius.


At a time when Lebanese Internet speeds are ridiculously slow and overpriced (at home I have a 512kb connection for $50 p/m … and that’s fast) the government is struggling to attract investment due to a decaying infrastructure. … So … instead of incentives … they start taxing….


I have an image of a guy with an abacus sliding beads across the bars. Time to join the 21st Century methinks.


The debate has actually been postponed at present thanks to, wait for it, an Internet campaign. Who’d of thought it?

4 comments:

  1. Here's a good article about this issue:

    http://thenational.ae/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100616/FOREIGN/706159882/1002/FOREIGN

    It was surprising to read (acc. to this article) that Lebanon's internet services rank below such underdeveloped countries as Afghanistan, Yemen or Bangladesh. That is simply not right!!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yep. It's crazy.

    The diaspora issue is huge. It's not just a cutesy case of calling grandma, these people send huge amounts home in remittances.

    Stupid, stupid, stupid.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hey there,

    thouroughly enjoyed reading this post as we are currently debating the digital agenda in the parliament and the question of privacy when it comes to EU citizens "fundamental" right to use the internet...yes, it is now considered a fundamental right, in the EU at least!...I'll let you know how the situation is in Laos but I do know Jonathan has the same connection speed as you and pays more than 100$ US for it!!! Fundamental but expensive right indeed!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Fil!

    I don't know if I'd ever consider it a fundamental human right ... but access to information is vital. Especially in areas like the Middle East.

    100USD for 512kb is insane!

    Good to hear from you!

    ReplyDelete